?

Log in

No account? Create an account
I can't believe ANYONE has the audacity to say that overpopulation is… - 神話蝶 [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
桜井香津美

[ website | victim of circumstance ]
[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

Links
[Links:| @ myspace @ facebook @ twitter ozy and millie sinfest you damn kid lush cosmetics ]

[Sep. 29th, 2004|09:25 am]
桜井香津美
I can't believe ANYONE has the audacity to say that overpopulation is a sham. o_O; I didn't know that a current world population of 6 billion people, expected to rise to 9 billion, wasn't considered overpopulation.
LinkReply

Comments:
[User Picture]From: xochitl
2004-09-29 06:31 am (UTC)
Since the world is 2/3 ocean, I don't think it was meant to handle 9 billion people. :/
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: aerialmelodies
2004-09-29 07:20 am (UTC)
The world is drastically overpopulated. The only "argument" I could see "against" that fact is that in certain countries - such as most of Western Europe - you are having less births and more deaths, aka the upside-down population pyramid. While that is dangerous for those countries alone, far too many third-world countries remain in the right-side up pyramid, although it is completely unbalanced. The bottom vastly outnumbers the top, and that is where overpopulation begins. So just because the developed nations are experiencing a die-off or whatnot does not mean that the world itself is trying to hold more than it can. 9 billion people cannot live efficiently off of the tiny amount of livable land we have on this earth, much less the amount of drinkable water. Besides, for such a fuss over the die-off in developed nations, we sure do use up more resources than those experiencing massive overpopulation and crowding. Go figure.
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: shinwachou
2004-09-29 03:19 pm (UTC)
Shel, please elope with me to B.C. and marry me. XD

You speak the words my brain is too dumb to think of. :P
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: aerialmelodies
2004-09-29 08:20 pm (UTC)
Aww~ :)

I think that more people should look at the small within the large, which I think is what I did. Something like that.

... Okay, basically people need to stop at TWO kids. That's one replacement for each parent, or even if you're a single parent, you're replacing yourself and one other human who may not have a child. Or something. x__X; Ignore me, I'm just confusing myself.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)